#2183 closed defect (fixed)
Deprecate and remove usge of TracLinks for embedding images
Reported by: | markus | Owned by: | Christian Boos |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | low | Milestone: | 0.10 |
Component: | wiki system | Version: | 0.9b2 |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description
Seems like Trac doesn't like jpegs. ;-)
While source:/folder/image.jpg/ works, source:/folder/image.jpg doesn't. It's the same with source:/folder/image.jpeg/ and source:/folder/image.jpeg.
Attachments (0)
Change History (16)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
Well, I'm still wondering why some images (like jpg, jpeg, png) are always broken and others (like bmp) get escaped as hyperlinks.
source:trunk/setup_wininst.bmp
: source:trunk/setup_wininst.bmp
source:trunk/htdocs/trac_banner.png
: source:trunk/htdocs/trac_banner.png
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
Component: | general → browser |
---|---|
Priority: | normal → low |
Resolution: | invalid |
Severity: | normal → minor |
Status: | closed → reopened |
The current behavior of guessing if the source path is an image, and if so, display it, is buggy and should be phased out.
I'm reopening the ticket for that.
Plain source links should always go to the browser page for the given path.
If one wants to have an inline display of an image
stored in the repository, use the Image macro
and give it source:<the_path>
as argument;
this works fine, e.g. [[Image(source:trunk/htdocs/trac_banner.png,width=50)]]
→
Also, we should interpret links like source:<the_path>?format=raw
to make a link to the raw document (see #2168).
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | reopened → new |
-
browser.py
27 27 from trac.wiki import wiki_to_html, wiki_to_oneliner, IWikiSyntaxProvider 28 28 from trac.versioncontrol.web_ui.util import * 29 29 30 IMG_RE = re.compile(r"\.(gif|jpg|jpeg|png)(\?.*)?$", re.IGNORECASE)31 32 30 CHUNK_SIZE = 4096 33 31 34 32 DIGITS = re.compile(r'[0-9]+') … … 237 235 ('browser', self._format_link)] 238 236 239 237 def _format_link(self, formatter, ns, path, label): 240 match = IMG_RE.search(path)241 if formatter.flavor != 'oneliner' and match:242 return '<img src="%s" alt="%s" />' % \243 (formatter.href.file(path, format='raw'), label)244 238 path, rev, line = get_path_rev_line(path) 245 239 if line is not None: 246 240 anchor = '#L%d' % line
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
Milestone: | → 0.9 |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
Thanks for clarification, Christian. I totally agree with your first comment. The way you describe these links should work is exactly what I was expecting from Trac and but ran into problems then.
comment:7 by , 19 years ago
Component: | browser → wiki |
---|---|
Milestone: | 0.9 → 1.0 |
Summary: | RegEx doesn't recognize .jpg/.jpeg → Deprecate and remove usge of TracLinks for embedding images |
I agree, but I don't think we should do this for 0.9. People/sites who've been using the image linking syntax will break.
comment:8 by , 19 years ago
It's already broken, for source: links.
source:trunk/htdocs/trac_banner.png
comment:10 by , 19 years ago
The thing is that people are probably using the syntax (using the ?format=raw
parameter where necessary).
Simply removing this support now will make those embedded images simply links. Maybe that's not so bad after all?
comment:11 by , 19 years ago
Let's say there are people using the source:
syntax (with or without ?format=raw
) for embedding images. With the current version of Trac (0.9) this syntax will never lead to an embedded image inside a wiki page or ticket comment, because it simply doesn't work (it's broken for both with and without ?format=raw
)
So, for existing tickets/wiki pages with this syntax in them this means that the browsers show broken image links. IMHO that's not what these people wanted to embed and so having a simple (but working) link to the TracBrowser displaying this image should be better than that.
comment:12 by , 19 years ago
Well, the reason that the "source:" image links are broken is because they point to the "/file" path, which was phased out and should now be "/browser". That should be fixed for now to keep the old behavior.
I agree that the automatic conversion of "source:" image links should be deprecated, although I think that we need to come up with some reasonable policy on how to handle deprecating features and when they will be removed.
P.S. the reason that ".bmp" links are not converted to <img> tags is because you really shouldn't be using ".bmp" files in a webpage.
comment:13 by , 19 years ago
Something like that?
-
browser.py
240 240 match = IMG_RE.search(path) 241 241 if formatter.flavor != 'oneliner' and match: 242 242 return '<img src="%s" alt="%s" />' % \ 243 (formatter.href.file(path, format='raw'), label) 243 (formatter.href.browser(path, format='raw'), 244 'WARNING: deprecated form, use [[Image(%s)]] instead' \ 245 % path) 244 246 path, rev, line = get_path_rev_line(path) 245 247 if line is not None: 246 248 anchor = '#L%d' % line
comment:14 by , 19 years ago
Milestone: | 1.0 → 0.11 |
---|
Deprecation warning added for milestone:0.10 in r3329, now scheduling removal for milestone:0.11.
comment:15 by , 18 years ago
Milestone: | 0.11 → 0.10 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | assigned → closed |
Actually, the removal was done in r3454. Mentioning this in the source:trunk/RELEASE for milestone:0.10 should be enough.
Just noticed that that Firefox displays the second links as plain text, while Internet Explorer displays (broken) image links. So, I guess that the ones that don't get escaped as hyperlinks are TracLinks for embedding images. Oops.