Edgewall Software

Changes between Version 75 and Version 76 of TracDev/ToDo


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 22, 2010, 1:49:39 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
Christian Boos
Comment:

moved documentation review discussion to 0.12/

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • TracDev/ToDo

    v75 v76  
    55
    66=== Documentation
    7  - get someone to proof read the new pages.
    8     - '''mark.m.mcmahon''': Do you mean the list of all pages under ["0.12/"] in TitleIndex?
    9       * '''cboos''': Yes.
    10     ''Would you suggest the following:''
    11      - Review the diff for each page that was copied (spelling, grammar, technical)
    12      - Review the page as a whole, formatting, etc
    13        * '''cboos''': Indeed, that would be my preferred way.
    14        Spelling and grammar fixes should be done straight ahead, no need to discuss them
    15        of course, the same for formatting fixes I suppose.
    16        Suggestions for documentation changes, additions or clarifications (or simplifications!)
    17        could be done in a variety of ways, just be creative! For example:
    18         * add a `=== Discussion` section at the bottom, with your remarks or additions
    19         * add `#!div` in place with some distinctive style, e.g.
    20         {{{
    21         {{{#!div style="background:#efe"
    22         Addition: / Rewrite:  / ...
    23         }}}
    24         }}}
    25         {{{#!div style="background:#efe"
    26         Addition: / Rewrite:  / ...
    27         }}}
    28         * in place italics may not stand out distinctive enough from the original documentation,
    29          you could use `[[span(style=background:#efe, Also mention...)]]`
    30          [[span(style=background:#efe, Also mention...)]]
    31         * ... or much simpler, none of the above, just boldly change the documentation
    32          if you think you can make an improvement (we'll notice the change and review the
    33          differences anyway)
    34      - does it make sense to log a bitesize, documentation bug for each doc review task?
    35       * '''cboos''': I don't think so, I think it'll be more effective to collaborate
    36       on the document in place
    37     - '''rblank''': I would suggest starting with the pages under 0.12, proofread whole pages (spelling, grammar, consistency, obsolete text) and fix things as you go along. You may want to open a single "Documentation review" ticket to document your progress for others potential reviewers (and get attribution!). 
     7 - get someone to proof read the new pages, see ["0.12/"] for guidelines
    388 - copy the current toplevel pages to 0.11/
    399 - copy the 0.12 pages back to the toplevel pages (merging the recent changes when needed)