#9306 closed defect (fixed)
CommitTicketUpdater does not close ticket
Reported by: | Owned by: | Remy Blank | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 0.12 |
Component: | ticket system | Version: | 0.12dev |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description
The CommitTicketUpdater plugin is adding comments correctly but not closing tickets as it should.
How to Reproduce
When pushing a changeset to a Mercurial repository with a comment such as "closes #1", CommitTicketUpdater adds "closes #1" as a new comment in ticket #1 but does not alter the status or resolution of the ticket.
The repository's changegroup hook is executing this script:
#!/bin/sh # Notify trac when new Mercurial changesets arrive. # Short repository name must be the same as its directory. TRACADMIN=/path/to/trac-admin ENVIRON=/path/to/trac/env REPONAME=`basename $PWD` REVS=`/path/to/hg log -r $HG_NODE:tip --template {node}\ ` export PYTHON_EGG_CACHE=/tmp/.python-eggs CMD="$TRACADMIN $ENVIRON changeset added $REPONAME $REVS" $CMD
System Information
Trac | 0.12b1 |
Docutils | 0.6 |
Genshi | 0.6 |
Mercurial | 1.5 |
mod_wsgi | 3.1 (WSGIProcessGroup WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}) |
Pygments | 1.1.1 |
pysqlite | 0.12b1 |
Python | 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 15 2010, 10:04:19) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (dot 1)] |
setuptools | 0.6c11 |
SQLite | 3.6.23.1 |
Subversion | 1.6.5 (r38866) |
Installed Plugins
TracMercurial | 0.12.0.21dev-r9589 |
Attachments (0)
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Thanks for the quick response. The changeset author was not the same as the Trac username. Tickets are properly closed when submitting a changeset as a Trac user with the TICKET_MODIFY permission.
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Replying to jakerothenbuhler@…:
The changeset author was not the same as the Trac username. Tickets are properly closed when submitting a changeset as a Trac user with the TICKET_MODIFY permission.
Thanks for the feedback. So, what do you think? Should the permission check be made optional?
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 15 years ago
If the permission check were made optional, I would probably leave it enabled. I was using different usernames by mistake. I want comments generated by CommitTicketUpdater to use the Trac username for clarity. Also, keeping Trac usernames and changeset authors synced simplifies searching and maintains consistency in the timeline. In spite of this, I think it would be a good idea to make the permission check optional because I can imagine situations where turning the permission check off would be beneficial.
It would be nice to be able to maintain consistency between a repository and Trac without using the same usernames for both. I like to use full name and email (e.g. John Smith <smith@…>) for changeset authorship, but these names are not usable as Trac usernames. Ideally, I would map Trac usernames to repository authors and Trac would then show the appropriate users when displaying changesets and ticket comments.
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
Milestone: | → 0.12.1 |
---|---|
Owner: | set to |
Replying to jakerothenbuhler@…:
It would be nice to be able to maintain consistency between a repository and Trac without using the same usernames for both. I like to use full name and email (e.g. John Smith <smith@…>) for changeset authorship, but these names are not usable as Trac usernames. Ideally, I would map Trac usernames to repository authors and Trac would then show the appropriate users when displaying changesets and ticket comments.
Yes, that was my thought, too. This probably requires a better user management than what we have at the moment.
I'll add an option to disable the permission checks.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
Milestone: | 0.12.1 → 0.12 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
Option added in [9629].
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
It would be nice to be able to maintain consistency between a repository and Trac without using the same usernames for both. I like to use full name and email (e.g. John Smith <smith@…>) for changeset authorship, but these names are not usable as Trac usernames. Ideally, I would map Trac usernames to repository authors and Trac would then show the appropriate users when displaying changesets and ticket comments.
I second this. Assuming that usernames in Trac and the repo are the same may be OK for SVN, but for sure not for i.e. Git, where users are identified by Full Name <email@…>
. Maybe adding a "repository identity" for each user would be enough?
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 14 years ago
How do I set this option from [9629] ?
I tried
[trac] ... commit_ticket_update_check_perms = False
But I still have this problem using git.
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
comment:10 by , 10 years ago
Check also, if you have set commit_ticket_update_commands.close
in the [ticket]
section. If not set, it should work, but maybe you set it to a strange or even empty value?
Is the author of the changeset the same as the username in Trac? The commit updater component checks if the changeset author has
TICKET_MODIFY
permission, and only then changes the ticket status.I wasn't too convinced that the permission check was a good idea in the first place, and I'm even less convinced now. Maybe it should be made optional?