Modify ↓
Opened 15 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#9046 new defect
Cannot create a TracLink to heading in ticket description
| Reported by: | Ryan J Ollos | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | low | Milestone: | next-major-releases |
| Component: | wiki system | Version: | 0.12dev |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | comment |
| Cc: | Branch: | ||
| Release Notes: | |||
| API Changes: | |||
| Internal Changes: | |||
Description
Perhaps an over-extension of the intended functionality of TracLinks, but I thought I would report it just in case it is a true defect in the intended design.
One can link to a section heading in a description: comment:description#anchor.
However, it doesn't seem to work to link to a section heading in the description field of another ticket: comment:description#anchor:ticket:num.
For example, see:
The resulting error when selecting the TracLink in (1) is:
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
| Keywords: | comment added |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | → next-major-0.1X |
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Seems I have a knack for finding problems and misinterpreting the actual defect ;)
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
| Priority: | normal → low |
|---|
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
| Reporter: | changed from to |
|---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Those links are indeed defective, but the intent was never to allow to specify linking to an anchor within a comment, as the comment: links are simply shorthands to link to the comment anchor itself.
i.e.
comment:1⇔[#comment:1](well, equivalent for the target, the link title is more up to the point for the comment: syntax)
Back to the original point: the examples you mentioned in those test tickets (
comment:description#Section1andcomment:description#Section2:ticket:52) should actually not be rendered as links (or amissinglink with appropriate explanation in the link title).