Opened 18 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#4449 closed task (fixed)
InterTrac entry for Trac+Darcs?
Reported by: | zu22 | Owned by: | Jonas Borgström |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | not applicable |
Component: | general | Version: | 0.10.3 |
Severity: | trivial | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description (last modified by )
Signed up for account on http://trac.us.netrek.org/projects/netrek-server/ and was in the wiki browsing some source code, when i clicked revisions and it produced:
Invalid literal for int():- Netrek Server - Trac http://trac.us.netrek.org/projects/netrek-server/anydiff?new_path=%2FVanilla%2Fname.c&old_path=%2FVanilla%2Fname.c&new_rev=&old_rev=
Oops… Trac detected an internal error: If you think this really should work and you can reproduce it, you should consider reporting this problem to the Trac team. Go to http://trac.edgewall.org/ and create a new ticket where you describe the problem, how to reproduce it. Don't forget to include the Python traceback found below. TracGuide — The Trac User and Administration Guide Python Traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/trac/web/main.py", line 387, in dispatch_request dispatcher.dispatch(req) File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/trac/web/main.py", line 237, in dispatch resp = chosen_handler.process_request(req) File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/trac/versioncontrol/web_ui/changeset.py", line 791, in process_request new_rev = repos.normalize_rev(new_rev) File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/tracdarcs/repository.py", line 148, in normalize_rev ValueError: invalid literal for int():
Attachments (0)
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Priority: | highest → normal |
Resolution: | → invalid |
Severity: | major → normal |
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Lele is now aware of the issue, follow up to http://progetti.arstecnica.it/trac%2Bdarcs/ticket/22
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
Milestone: | → none |
---|---|
Resolution: | invalid |
Status: | closed → reopened |
Summary: | clicking revisions produces error → errors in Trac+Darcs ... |
Type: | defect → task |
Jonas, you could perhaps add an InterTrac link to his Trac:
[intertrac] trac+darcs.title = Lele's Trac plugin for Darcs trac+darcs.url = http://progetti.arstecnica.it/trac+darcs trac+darcs.compat = false
(using this ticket as a reminder)
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
Summary: | errors in Trac+Darcs ... → InterTrac entry for Trac+Darcs? |
---|
For the history, the bug on trac+darcs was fixed long ago.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Severity: | normal → trivial |
Status: | reopened → closed |
Done ([trac+darcs:]).
Yes, it's certainly reproducable. However I don't believe the bug is in trac, it's in TracDarcs.