Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
#3092 closed defect (wontfix)
Segmentation fault when accessing history
Reported by: | Owned by: | Christian Boos | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | general | Version: | 0.9.5 |
Severity: | major | Keywords: | crash |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description
I'm running tracd with two projects:
tracd -p 8080 -e /var/trac -a project1,/var/trac/users.htdigest,Project1Realm \ -a project2,/var/trac/users.htdigest,Project2Realm
It worked OK if every project had separate users.htdigest file. I wanted to centralize user administration, so I've merged all htdigest files into one (there are multiple instances of the same user, but with different realms).
Apparently tracd doesn't like it and segfaults when I'm logged in and try to open any page that requires authentication.
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
Component: | tracd → timeline |
---|---|
Severity: | major → normal |
Summary: | tracd segfault caused by digest auth → Segmentation fault when accessing history |
I've reverted my changes to htdigest files and I still get segfaults when accessing one of the projects, so my original diagnose is invalid… sorry.
I also get same crash in trac-admin when I run resync:
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 15970)] [New Thread 16386 (LWP 16002)] [Thread 16386 (LWP 16002) exited] [New Thread 32771 (LWP 16035)] [Thread 32771 (LWP 16035) exited] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 30464)] 0x409e6237 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x409e6237 in ?? () #1 0x400ff050 in __JCR_LIST__ () from /usr/lib/libpython2.3.so.1.0 #2 0x407fcf34 in ?? () #3 0xbfffd978 in ?? () #4 0x400ff050 in __JCR_LIST__ () from /usr/lib/libpython2.3.so.1.0 #5 0x081c5b48 in ?? () #6 0x081c5b48 in ?? () #7 0xbfffd998 in ?? () #8 0x40ac7402 in ?? () #9 0x081c5b48 in ?? () #10 0x00000024 in ?? () #11 0xbfffd998 in ?? () #12 0x4010db1e in pthread_setspecific () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
In the gdb backtrace, I spotted: This GDB was configured as "i586-suse-linux".
What SuSE version is that? More specifically, what's the output of
python -V
? If it's 2.3.0+
, I'd suggest rebuilding your own python,
and try again, as I've also had segfaults with that particular version.
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
SuSe 9.1. Python 2.3.3. SQLite 3.2.2.
Is 2.3.3 far enough from 2.3.0, or should I switch to 2.4?
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
Component: | timeline → general |
---|---|
Keywords: | crash added |
Owner: | changed from | to
Severity: | normal → major |
The bugs I was refering to were fixed in 2.3.3c1 (Release date: 05-Dec-2003), so unless your 2.3.3 is older than that, it must be something else.
Double check the requirements listed for ClearSilver and PySqlite, especially regarding thread-safeness, and report which version you used.
Also, it seems a bit strange to me that trac-admin/resync spawns multiple threads. I'll try to have a look at that later.
comment:7 by , 19 years ago
I've tried upgrading to latest stable python 2.3, but that makes dependency hell break lose :(
I've recompiled SQLite with --enable-threadsafe
and ran sqlite3 trac.db-old .dump | sqlite3 trac.db
Still crashes.
comment:8 by , 18 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Well, this must have been a very specific issue, since no one else has seen that.
If reopening is needed, please include a C stacktrace (ideally also a Python backtrace), just saying "it crashed" is not helpful… See also TracTroubleshooting#DebuggingSegmentationFaults
A traceback of the error would be immensely useful. Or do you mean an actual segfault in native code?