#11118 closed enhancement (fixed)
Add a functional test case for milestone attachments
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Ryan J Ollos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.0.2 |
| Component: | attachment | Version: | 1.0-stable |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | milestone attachment functional test case |
| Cc: | Branch: | ||
| Release Notes: |
Added a functional test case for milestone attachments. |
||
| API Changes: |
Added method |
||
| Internal Changes: | |||
Description
I've recently experienced an issue with a theme failing to provide attachment functionality for milestones, therefore I propose to add a functional test case (or multiple test cases) for milestones attachments.
Attachments (0)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
| Keywords: | milestone attachment functional test case added |
|---|
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
Here is a stack of changes that accomplishes my goals for this ticket and cleans up a few other things:
- cf4d963b: (Unrelated) Removed unused code in
batch.py. - cbfc1f2c:Added a
go_to_milestonemethod to theFunctionalTesterclass. - 140de6abAdded a
attach_file_to_milestonemethod to theFunctionalTesterclass. - b928492f: Added a test for milestone attachments.
- b5ee4722: Refactored common code in
FunctionalTesterinto_attach_file_to_resource. - 871c64d1: Refactored
FunctionalTester._attach_file_to_resource(see detailed changes in commit message). - d113b5ca: Renamed
tempfilenametofilenamefor conciseness and clarity. - b6789076: Replaced
==and!=withisandis notwhen rhs isNone.
I learned something rather unfortunate while implementing this. The regex for (4) has the rel attribute before the href attribute, which was required for the test to pass. However, when inspecting the HTML in Firefox for this failing test, the rel attribute came after the href attribute. I'm not surprised that this is browser dependent, but I suppose it would be desirable to call twill's find in a way that would not depend on the order of the attributes.
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
| Component: | general → attachment |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | → 1.0.2 |
| Owner: | set to |
| Status: | new → assigned |
| Version: | → 1.0-stable |
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
| API Changes: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Release Notes: | modified (diff) |
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Refactorings committed in [11894:11898] and merged to trunk in [11900].
Functional test case added in [11899] and merged to trunk in [11901].
The == → is refactorings in [11895] should have been part of a different changeset, but I guess I didn't commit one of the patches before applying the next.
comment:6 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
1 test failure on trunk. It seems that [11831] isn't merged into trunk and is marked "merged" on svn:mergeinfo in [11853].
Add attachments to the milestone. ... ERROR
======================================================================
ERROR: Add attachments to the milestone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "trac/ticket/tests/functional.py", line 1065, in runTest
filename = self._tester.attach_file_to_milestone(milestone_name)
File "/home/jun66j5/src/trac/edgewall/github/trac/tests/functional/tester.py", line 313, in attach_file_to_milestone
self.go_to_milestone(name)
AttributeError: 'FunctionalTester' object has no attribute 'go_to_milestone'
comment:7 by , 12 years ago
I've been waiting for the work on #5658 to be finished before merging [11831:11832]. I should have the next round of changes posted for review later today.
I'm not sure what happened with [11853]. Maybe I had previously merged [11831:11832] in the working copy and reverted all of the changes except the prop change on the root of the working copy, and then inadvertently captured that change while merging [11852].
comment:8 by , 12 years ago
… although there doesn't seem to be a good reason to not merge [11831] now. I'm not sure why I stopped at [11830] while doing the merges [11844:11849]. I should have stopped at [11831], only deferring the merge of [11832]. I'll merge [11831] to the trunk now and remove [11832] from the svn:mergeinfo property.
comment:9 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Should be fixed with [11902] and [11903]. Tests on the trunk are passing for me now.
I did yet another stupid thing, accidentally prefixing the log message in [11902] with 1.0.2dev. It seems that I can't fix this though,
$ svn propedit -r 11902 --revprop svn:log https://svn.edgewall.org/repos/trac Revprop change blocked by pre-revprop-change hook (exit code 1) with output: Changing *any* revision properties prohibited for now



Now that I've opened two tickets for adding functional test cases (#11109 being the other), I just wanted to ask if I should continue to open a ticket per significant test case that is needed, or if there is some other way that you'd like me to approach this. I just want to make sure that I'm not generating too much noise in the ticket system