Opened 12 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#11002 closed defect (fixed)
No To: headers
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Jun Omae | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.2.5 |
| Component: | notification | Version: | |
| Severity: | minor | Keywords: | cc ticket |
| Cc: | Branch: | ||
| Release Notes: |
List owner, reporter and updater of the ticket in |
||
| API Changes: | |||
| Internal Changes: | |||
Description
Can you believe creating a bug here doesn't even generate a basic To: header?! Spam trackers nail them.
Attachments (1)
Change History (12)
by , 12 years ago
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
| Component: | general → notification |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | cc added |
| Milestone: | → next-major-releases |
| Severity: | trivial → minor |
I just checked how other bugtrackers do this… Indeed Mantis for example put everyone in the To: header.
As long as we have Add to Cc:, it seems a bit odd to not add one to the Cc:…
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
We always have a undisclosed-recipients: ; To: header now. Does that resolve this ticket?
follow-up: 6 comment:5 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | next-major-releases |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → worksforme |
| Status: | new → closed |
Thanks for confirming. Closing ticket.
For anyone wondering: undisclosed-recipients: ; is an empty "group address" with display name "undisclosed-recipients". See rfc:5322#section-3.4, rfc:5322#appendix-A.1.3:
Because the list of mailboxes can be empty, using the group construct is also a simple way to communicate to recipients that the message was sent to one or more named sets of recipients, without actually providing the individual mailbox address for any of those recipients.
Seems we got that in changeset:13454 via th:AnnouncerPlugin from th:changeset:7655.
Before that Trac only sometimes used a To: header, depending on if ticket owner or reporter were notified, and on the use_public_cc configuration option.
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 6 years ago
| Keywords: | ticket added |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | → 1.2.4 |
| Priority: | lowest → normal |
| Resolution: | worksforme |
| Status: | closed → reopened |
Replying to Peter Suter:
Before that Trac only sometimes used a
To:header, depending on if ticket owner or reporter were notified, and on the use_public_cc configuration option.
I consider we should keep the behavior also since 1.2.x.
I'm using AnnouncerPlugin on Trac 1.0.x in production environment. I've thought a user takes no mind even if the address is listed in which of to/cc header. However, I've received inquiry about the behavior and the user wanted to list address of the user in To header. I guess that the user receives all ticket and is using filter "my address is contained in To header" to catch owned tickets in mail user agent.
Proposed changes in [cd93cf992/jomae.git] (jomae.git@t11002).
comment:7 by , 6 years ago
| Owner: | set to |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → assigned |
Proposed changes in [cd93cf992/jomae.git] (jomae.git@t11002).
Added unit tests for RecipientMatcher in [8f1800c61/jomae.git].
comment:8 by , 5 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.2.4 → 1.2.5 |
|---|
comment:10 by , 5 years ago
Yeah. I'd like to push the branch.
- log:jomae.git@t11002.1+1.2 (rebased on 1.2-stable)
- log:jomae.git@t11002.1+trunk (cherry picked the changes in the above branch)
comment:11 by , 5 years ago
| Release Notes: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Mail message