Allow to force CommitTicketUpdater to add only comments

[anonymous]

In our environment developers are not allowed to close tickets, since we use the ticket workflow with the additional 'testing' status.

In this case I would like that every svn commit message like

this is for #1 #2

only looks for ticket id's like #1 and ignores all other commands like close or ref, and simply assumes that the user says see.

I add a patch where you can set

[ticket]
commit_ticket_update_force_comments = true

In this case, all commands are internally set to see.

Its not thats fine but it works.

Stephane

[Remy Blank]

This can already be achieved by setting the configuration as follows:

[ticket]
commit_ticket_update_commands.close =
commit_ticket_update_commands.refs = <ALL>
commit_ticket_update_check_perms = true

It is even documented in the TracIni entry for commit_ticket_update_commands.refs.

[anonymous]

Replying to rblank:

This can already be achieved by setting the configuration as follows: It is even documented in the TracIni entry for commit_ticket_update_commands.refs.

yes … but only after having aktivated the plugin.

I admit I didn't realize this.

Perhaps it would be good to mention

commit_ticket_update_commands.refs = <ALL>

in CommitTicketUpdater too. This was the first doc I did read even before aktivating the commit-ticket-update plugin, and since this possibility was not mentioned, I simly didn't realize this.

Sorry for that :-(

[Remy Blank]

Replying to anonymous:

Perhaps it would be good to mention

commit_ticket_update_commands.refs = <ALL>

in CommitTicketUpdater too.

Feel free to edit that page and add what you expected to find there.

[anonymous]

Replying to anonymous:

… Sorry for that :-(

You can redeem yourself by editing that Wiki page accordingly :-)

[AdrianFritz]

Replying to anonymous:

You can redeem yourself by editing that Wiki page accordingly :-)

Documented at @ CommitTicketUpdater@10 Please, can you check if it's on the right place and has correct information?

[Remy Blank]

Replying to AdrianFritz:

Please, can you check if it's on the right place and has correct information?

Looks great, thanks!