| 7 | | - get someone to proof read the new pages. Do you mean the list of all pages under 0.12 in TitleIndex? Would you suggest the following: |
| 8 | | - Review the diff for each page that was copied (spelling, grammar, technical) |
| 9 | | - Review the page as a whole, formatting, etc |
| 10 | | - does it make sense to log a bitesize, documentation bug for each doc review task? |
| | 7 | - get someone to proof read the new pages. |
| | 8 | - '''mark.m.mcmahon''': Do you mean the list of all pages under 0.12 in TitleIndex? Would you suggest the following: |
| | 9 | - Review the diff for each page that was copied (spelling, grammar, technical) |
| | 10 | - Review the page as a whole, formatting, etc |
| | 11 | - does it make sense to log a bitesize, documentation bug for each doc review task? |
| | 12 | - '''rblank''': I would suggest starting with the pages under 0.12, proofread whole pages (spelling, grammar, consistency, obsolete text) and fix things as you go along. You may want to open a single "Documentation review" ticket to document your progress for others potential reviewers (and get attribution!). |
