#8169 closed enhancement (fixed)
Ability to run functional tests on non-sqlite
Reported by: | Tim Hatch | Owned by: | Tim Hatch |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 0.11.5 |
Component: | general | Version: | none |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | pycon-sprint testing |
Cc: | shanec@… | Branch: | |
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description
We need to be able to somehow configure the functional tests to run against other db backends. This got brought up last night at the Trac BoF at PyCon again, so I'm going to track down the patch I have and we should look into getting it integrated.
Attachments (0)
Change History (23)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 16 years ago
I did some further work on the branch, so that the functional tests with alternate db backends would work on Windows.
One thing I'm definitely not happy with at this point (r8135) is the FunctionalTestEnvironment.destroy_mysql
method and its use of grep
…
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
One thing I'm definitely not happy with at this point (r8135) is the
FunctionalTestEnvironment.destroy_mysql
method and its use ofgrep
…
This should be fixed in r8155, however I'd like to get more feedback on this before merging on trunk (does it also work on Linux, things I may have missed compared to the previous solution, etc.)
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
I'm currently installing PostgreSQL, and I'll try to test on Linux and OS X.
comment:5 by , 16 years ago
All tests pass on OS X and Linux (actually, I get a single error on the latter, in the backup test, but this is due to the PostgreSQL server running on another machine, so pg_dump
cannot be found locally).
I'm trying to set up a build slave running the tests with PostgreSQL. Once that is done, I'll do the same for MySQL.
comment:6 by , 16 years ago
I have set up the build slave for PostgreSQL, and created build configurations for 0.11-stable, trunk and rework-testing. However, there's an issue when emptying the database before creating the new environment. In testenv.py, the database is emptied in destroy()
before the new environment is created, but only if a previous environment exists. This is not true when running the build slave, as the environment is created in a new checkout for every run. So the tests pass the first time, but subsequent runs fail to create the environment.
Fixing this is a bit tricky, as it involves emptying the database regardless of the existence of an environment, but then there's no environment to get a connection from. The easiest is probably to use a dummy environment just for cleaning the database.
comment:7 by , 16 years ago
I have also created a build configuration for MySQL, currently only for the rework-testing
branch. All tests pass, but the same issue with the database cleanup occurs.
comment:8 by , 16 years ago
Is it possible to configure the build slaves so that they run in the same location, perhaps by doing an update instead of a checkout?
Unless you're already working on it, I'm thinking of moving the database cleanup code to trac.test and have the EnvironmentStub use it as well.
comment:9 by , 16 years ago
I am working on it. The idea is not to use the previous environment at all, but to instantiate PostgreSQLConnection
or MySQLConnection
directly just to clean the database. Something like:
-
trac/tests/functional/testenv.py
diff --git a/trac/tests/functional/testenv.py b/trac/tests/functional/testenv.py
a b 16 16 from trac.tests.functional.better_twill import tc, ConnectError 17 17 from trac.env import open_environment 18 18 from trac.db.api import _parse_db_str, DatabaseManager 19 from trac.db.mysql_backend import MySQLConnection 20 from trac.db.postgres_backend import PostgreSQLConnection 19 21 from trac.util.compat import close_fds 20 22 21 23 # TODO: refactor to support testing multiple frontends, backends (and maybe … … 98 100 99 101 def destroy(self): 100 102 """Remove all of the test environment data.""" 101 if os.path.exists(self.dirname): 102 env = self.get_trac_environment() 103 dburi = DatabaseManager(env).connection_uri 104 scheme, db_prop = _parse_db_str(self.dburi) 105 db = env.get_db_cnx() 106 if scheme == 'postgres': 107 self.destroy_postgresql(db) 108 elif scheme == 'mysql': 109 self.destroy_mysqldb(db, db_prop) 110 env.shutdown() 103 scheme, db_prop = _parse_db_str(self.dburi) 104 if scheme == 'postgres': 105 db = PostgreSQLConnection(**db_prop) 106 self.destroy_postgresql(db) 107 elif scheme == 'mysql': 108 db = MySQLConnection(**db_prop) 109 self.destroy_mysqldb(db, db_prop) 111 110 112 111 self.destroy_repo() 113 112 if os.path.exists(self.dirname):
First tests seem to indicate that this works.
comment:10 by , 16 years ago
remy: I'm +1 on that, but couldn't figure out how to get the list of tables used by Trac (in particular when plugins are being used).
comment:11 by , 16 years ago
Christian has already implemented a generic solution. With PostgreSQL, the whole schema is dropped. With MySQL, the table names are retrieved from the information_schema.tables
table.
comment:12 by , 16 years ago
Ok, the approach works well with both PostgreSQL and MySQL. Patch committed in [8156].
comment:13 by , 16 years ago
Just a quick update for avoiding duplicate efforts: I've been working on having the unit-test use the TRAC_TEST_DB_URI switch as well for selecting which DB backend to use. I'm nearly there (6 failures left in both mysql and postgres).
comment:14 by , 16 years ago
comment:15 by , 16 years ago
Change above ported to trunk in r8194. I noticed 8 failures (build:1579 and build:1580), due to the cache
table being missing. I don't exactly get why - also had the error locally once, at the next run everything was fine.
What I'd like to do next on this topic is to add the possibility to specify TRAC_TEST_DB_URI=sqlite:trac/db/trac.db, i.e. run the tests with a SQLite database on the filesystem, as opposed to the in-memory one. Thanks to reset_db()
, this should be now easy.
comment:16 by , 16 years ago
That's weird. I invalidated build:1579 and it passed the second time. Is it possible that there's a transient error when creating the database? Doesn't seem likely…
follow-up: 18 comment:17 by , 16 years ago
The error message was:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/tracbuilder/src/bitten-2.5-pg/work/build_trunk_1580/trac/wiki/tests/formatter.py", line 139, in setUp wiki.save('joe', 'Entry page', '::1', datetime.now(utc)) File "/Users/tracbuilder/src/bitten-2.5-pg/work/build_trunk_1580/trac/wiki/model.py", line 153, in save WikiSystem(self.env).pages.invalidate(db) File "/Users/tracbuilder/src/bitten-2.5-pg/work/build_trunk_1580/trac/cache.py", line 109, in invalidate CacheManager(self.env).invalidate(self.id, db) File "/Users/tracbuilder/src/bitten-2.5-pg/work/build_trunk_1580/trac/cache.py", line 203, in invalidate "WHERE id=%s", (id,)) File "/Users/tracbuilder/src/bitten-2.5-pg/work/build_trunk_1580/trac/db/util.py", line 50, in execute return self.cursor.execute(sql_escape_percent(sql), args) File "/Users/tracbuilder/src/bitten-2.5-pg/work/build_trunk_1580/trac/db/util.py", line 50, in execute return self.cursor.execute(sql_escape_percent(sql), args) ProgrammingError: relation "cache" does not exist
but that was after the insert succeeded in the wiki
table.
So yes, it's a bit strange, how come the database could have the wiki
table and not the cache
table?
The only explanation for this is that there was already a schema in that test database that didn't contain the cache
table. I thought this wouldn't happen in our case, as we had tested the cache before, but situations like that are certainly possible in the general case, e.g. just after a database version upgrade.
So I guess I have to complement reset_db()
with a check of the database version before erasing the tables and do a destroy_db()
/init_db()
if the version doesn't match the expected one.
follow-up: 19 comment:18 by , 16 years ago
Replying to cboos:
So I guess I have to complement
reset_db()
with a check of the database version before erasing the tables and do adestroy_db()
/init_db()
if the version doesn't match the expected one.
… and this is needed rather sooner than later as the tests currently fail on multirepos (with the ported changes from trunk, not yet committed):
ProgrammingError: relation "repository" does not exist
And we need to be able to test back on an older database version, when we use the same TRAC_TEST_DB_URI and switching back and forth between branches…
follow-up: 20 comment:19 by , 16 years ago
So I guess I have to complement
reset_db()
with a check of the database version before erasing the tables and do adestroy_db()
/init_db()
if the version doesn't match the expected one.
This was implemented in [8205].
Now something strange happened - I tested the change on multirepos mainly on my version before integrating changes from upstream. Moments later I redid the testing with latest version and then noticed some failures, which I fixed by adding one more call to reset_db
(r8208). That last change triggered a build failure in the functional tests for one platform (and only one), see build:1652. Remy, any chance to have a closer look at what happened there, as I can't reproduce this?
comment:20 by , 16 years ago
Replying to cboos:
That last change triggered a build failure in the functional tests for one platform (and only one), see build:1652. Remy, any chance to have a closer look at what happened there, as I can't reproduce this?
Yes, it's not the first time that this happens. I have invalidated that build, and the second time it succeeded. It may be due to my various build slaves not being completely isolated from each other. Somehow I don't manage to set a different temporary directory for each slave, so they all create their repository in /tmp/trac-svnrepos
. The symptom for this is usually a failure to call trac-admin initenv
to initialize the test environment, but maybe there are more subtle issues.
I'll revisit the build slaves soon, as I want to create a few scripts to make it easy to create build slaves on all platforms. Hopefully I can find out what's happening here.
comment:21 by , 15 years ago
Milestone: | 0.12 → 0.11.5 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
There are still a few corner-case issues left - see #8518 for those.
But the bulk of the change was completed for 0.11.5 and we used that feature a lot during the testing of 0.11.5, so I'm closing this ticket against this milestone.
follow-up: 23 comment:22 by , 15 years ago
Keywords: | testing added |
---|
I still have the sqlite file database support to finish, but that will be for later. If anyone's interested in the meantime, just ask for the patch.
Right now I use a shell script to setup the postgres database in my dev environment. I can modify that to do a setup/teardown for testing. It could also be moved into python or separated out and left as a shell script.
There's also ticket:2304 I submitted some time ago that provides a backup interface, we'll chat about that since it might be useful for testing as well. I have a couple different postgres backup implementations that I'd be happy to make into a plugin or otherwise provide.