Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#7924 closed defect (wontfix)
Link presentation error
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | low | Milestone: | |
Component: | wiki system | Version: | 0.11rc1 |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | needinfo |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description
this happens when usinng InterTrac links or with http:// links, but my examples will be using my intertrac links
So I have 2 links I created that look like this:
[SAB:discussion:1?&order=id&desc=1 2008][[br]] [SAB:discussion:2?&order=id&desc=1 2009][[br]]
in this case I am linking to a forum entry in the same trac, but it also will do it if I point to another.
the link has in it some sort of un-copyable box & arrow before the link, I don't know what you call it, so i will use @>
so..
[SAB:discussion:1?&order=id&desc=1 2008][[br]] [SAB:discussion:2?&order=id&desc=1 2009][[br]]
produces this in the wiki:
2008 @>2009
strange. The links look identical, but one gets the box, and the other does not.. it didn't really match,
so I tried some variations and came up with this:
[SAB:discussion:01?&order=id&desc=1 2008][[br]] [SAB:discussion:2?&order=id&desc=1 2009][[br]]
that produces this:
@>2008 @>2009
it appears to be fixed here at Trac.com, however, I figured it might be indicative of something that had to do with the parsing of that sort string. so basically, an FYI
my variations pointing to this trac produce no @> indicators, so perhaps this behavior has changed:
[trac:discussion:1?&order=id&desc=1 2008][[br]] [trac:discussion:01?&order=id&desc=1 2008][[br]] [trac:discussion:2?&order=id&desc=1 2009][[br]]
produces this:
Attachments (0)
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Component: | general → wiki system |
---|---|
Keywords: | needinfo added |
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
No feedback in three months, closing.
This is most likely an interference with a plugin.
Try disabling all of them, then reintroduce them one by one to identify which one is responsible.