ordered lists that start with numbers greater than 9 start at 1

[Harlan Iverson]

Lists that are supposed start with any number greater than 9 actually start at 1. Possibly related to #2446.

example:

 10. This item should start with ten
 1. I should be eleven

output:

10. This item should start with ten
11. I should be eleven

[flyingfred0@…]

The following patch seemed to fix the problem for me:

--- trac/wiki/formatter.py	(revision 5695)
+++ trac/wiki/formatter.py	(working copy)
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@
             type_ = 'ul'
         else:
             type_ = 'ol'
-            idx = '01iI'.find(listid)
+            idx = '0iI'.find(listid)
             if idx >= 0:
                 class_ = ('arabiczero', None, 'lowerroman', 'upperroman')[idx]
             elif listid.isdigit():

I tried with these test cases:

 10. Ten
 1. Eleven
 1. Twelve
 1. Thirteen

 10. Ten
 11. Eleven
 12. Twelve
 13. Thirteen

When it works correctly, the list number should be the same as the list item. Without the patch, the lists are numbered 1,2,3,4.

10. Ten
11. Eleven
12. Twelve
13. Thirteen

10. Ten
11. Eleven
12. Twelve
13. Thirteen

[mromani@…]

I can confirm that the proposed patch solves the problem in trac 0.10.3.1

Thank you.

[lkraav <leho@…>]

i just ran into this, saw #8958 in timeline. 0.12-multirepos-r9032 currently also truncates all numbers starting with 1x(xx..) → 1. other numbers, 20. 30. 345. seem to work fine.

[Christian Boos]

Duplicate of #8892, which was fixed for 0.12.