Opened 9 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#12218 closed enhancement (fixed)
Make file should accept optional module or package name for pylint command
Reported by: | Ryan J Ollos | Owned by: | Ryan J Ollos |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.2.2 |
Component: | general | Version: | |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | makefile pylint bitesized |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: |
Filename, module or package can be passed to |
||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description
make pylint
generates a huge amount of output, which can be overwhelming if you just want to check a few files before submitting a patch or committing a change. It would be useful if, for example, make pylint trac.ticket.model
or make pylint trac/ticket/model.py
would only run pylint for the specified module.
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Keywords: | bitesized added |
---|
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Milestone: | next-major-releases → next-dev-1.3.x |
---|---|
Owner: | set to |
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | next-dev-1.3.x → 1.2.2 |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Release Notes: | modified (diff) |
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 1.2.2 → 1.2.3 |
---|---|
Release Notes: | modified (diff) |
I tried supporting make pylint
and make pylint=module_or_pkg
, but could not figure out how to make it work. Instead, the proposed changes support make pylint
and make pylint module=module_or_pkg
: [f744ff10c/rjollos.git].
comment:5 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 1.2.3 → 1.2.2 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | assigned → closed |
This, and maybe try to see if we could benefit from autopep8.