Translation of Trac to Galician/Galego [gl_ES]

[chavescesures@…]

This ticket should be used to coordinate the translation to Galician.

[chavescesures@…]

galician translation of Trac messages

[chavescesures@…]

tradución actualizada (27 marzo 2009)
updated translation (2009-03-27)

[chavescesures@…]

tradución actualizada (27 marzo 2009) - updated translation (2009-03-27)

[jruigrok]

Committed in r8053.

Thanks!

[chavescesures@…]

A new update of galician translation of Trac

[sdocio]

Hi,

I found some typos in the strings.

L.285: Maybe it should be "Acción" instead of "Ección".
L.741: Maybe it should be "propietario" instead of "porpietario".
L.822: Maybe it should be "completamente" instead of "competamente".
L.1060: Maybe "Versión_" should be "Versión:"
L.1553: "Substituir" should be "Substituír".
L.2358: "rrequire" should be "require".
L.2372: "conten" should be "contén".

BTW, there are some other mistakes related with the new rules for the Galician language:

L.481: I think that using "Sen embargo" is not allowed anymore (perhaps "porén").
L.537: I think that using "Noraboa" is not allowed anymore (perhaps "parabéns").
L.719 and 753: I think that using "Descripción" is not allowed ("descrición").
L.1596 and 2654: I think that "Diferencias" should be "Diferenzas".

Thank you chavescesures for your great work.

[cboos]

messages.3.po​ committed in r9098.

(a bit like I asked previously to the Russian team):

• what do you think is best for handling the translations in the future: use a dedicated tool like Transifex, have one of you be a committer for the locale/gl_ES area, etc.
• would it be OK for you that I rename gl_ES to simply gl? We're trying to use only ISO 639-1 codes where possible (and it looks better on ​Transifex ;-) )

[chavescesures@…]

Replying to cboos:

messages.3.po​ committed in r9098.

(a bit like I asked previously to the Russian team):

• what do you think is best for handling the translations in the future: use a dedicated tool like Transifex, have one of you be a committer for the locale/gl_ES area, etc.

well, I have actually no idea of which method would be better. If it gets documented somewhere, just go on with anything that you (or the rest of the people) think is the best way to work with it. Plus, it is always a good idea to try out different and new things. So, go on.

• would it be OK for you that I rename gl_ES to simply gl?

Yes, please. Actually, that's the right name for this locale. It was my mistake, I thought it was mandatory for trac to use a "two-element" locale name, so I chose "gl_ES", but the right one should be just 'gl'.

We're trying to use only ISO 639-1 codes where possible (and it looks better on ​Transifex ;-) )

[cboos]

Replying to chavescesures@…:

well, I have actually no idea of which method would be better. If it gets documented somewhere, just go on with anything that you (or the rest of the people) think is the best way to work with it. Plus, it is always a good idea to try out different and new things. So, go on.

Thanks for the feedback.

• would it be OK for you that I rename gl_ES to simply gl?

Yes, please. Actually, that's the right name for this locale. It was my mistake, I thought it was mandatory for trac to use a "two-element" locale name, so I chose "gl_ES", but the right one should be just 'gl'.

Perfect, done in r9102.