Edgewall Software

Ticket #3251 (reopened task)

Opened 2 years ago

Last modified 5 months ago

A documentation about components should be added

Reported by: dcarter@… Owned by: jonas
Priority: normal Milestone: 0.13
Component: wiki system Version: 0.9.6
Severity: normal Keywords: component wiki
Cc: linuxadmin@…

Description

I'm trying to update the list of components for my ticket system, but I've been unable to find any way in either the gui or configuration that will allow me to do this.

Attachments

Change History

follow-up: ↓ 7   Changed 2 years ago by mgood

  • status changed from new to closed
  • resolution set to worksforme

Components can be managed with trac-admin or with the WebAdmin plugin.

In the future please use the MailingList to ask for help.

  Changed 2 years ago by neokilly

  • status changed from closed to reopened
  • type changed from defect to task
  • component changed from ticket system to wiki
  • summary changed from No documented means of changing the components in the ticket system to A documentation about components should be added
  • version changed from 0.9.5 to 0.9.6
  • milestone set to 0.10
  • keywords component wiki added
  • resolution worksforme deleted

In fact, no information about components is given through the default wiki pages (those available after the installation)

I guess the purpose of the original ticket was to point out this fact and to ask if information about components (how to manage them) could be added to the Wiki documentation, as a new chapter for TracGuide, for example

Hoping you would consider this as useful, I've reopened the ticket

  Changed 2 years ago by cboos

  • milestone changed from 0.10 to 0.10.1

Sorry, at this point pushing something into the 0.10 release means it's either a bug fix, or that you have a non-controversial patch ready to apply ;)

So I'm post-poning this. The suggestion in itself is worthwhile though. Maybe you can start by editing TracTickets and perhaps TicketComponent? Though I don't think that at this point components deserve a chapter on their own. Not until they become Trac "resources" themselves, if this happens one day.

  Changed 2 years ago by neokilly

Oops (for the wrong milestone), sure, I do understand

I'll take a look at the wiki pages, thanks

  Changed 2 years ago by neokilly

Done!

See TracTickets and its diff

Please correct any mistakes or faults-due-to-a-french-translation. Hope it can help

  Changed 2 years ago by neokilly

Oh, and thanks for such a great software!

in reply to: ↑ 1   Changed 2 years ago by sid@…

  • status changed from reopened to closed
  • resolution set to fixed

Okay, I updated those pages as well, building on neokilly's work.

Looks done to me.

  Changed 2 years ago by cboos

  • status changed from closed to reopened
  • resolution fixed deleted

Thanks for the contribution to the documentation. I'll integrate the TicketComponent page in the repos, in a few days. I'll close the ticket at that time.

  Changed 2 years ago by sid

Perhaps TicketComponent should also be renamed to TracTicketComponent??

  Changed 19 months ago by cboos

  • milestone changed from 0.10.5 to 0.12

Probably worth it when we have "real" components.

follow-up: ↓ 12   Changed 5 months ago by Ivan G Shevchenko <linuxadmin@…>

  • cc linuxadmin@… added

is #7411 (currently "closed wontfix") a duplicate ticket of this one?

@cbos what are "real" components? is there a proposal? thanx!

in reply to: ↑ 11   Changed 5 months ago by cboos

Replying to Ivan G Shevchenko <linuxadmin@yandex.ru>:

is #7411 (currently "closed wontfix") a duplicate ticket of this one?

I don't think so, no. This ticket is about the documentation of the usage of components in Trac ("documentation about components should be added").

@cbos what are "real" components? is there a proposal? thanx!

As for now there's really nothing special about components (it's just a list, could as well be a custom field among others), there's IMO nothing special needed in the documentation about them. What's written in TracTicket#TicketFields? should be enough (of course, the information or the wording itself in that page can always be improved).

I think a special, separate page (like the proposed TicketComponent page) would be worth including in the documentation iff the component acquire the status of a first-class object (a.k.a. resource) in the Trac system (see #1233, #1678, #3991), otherwise it's just overkill IMO.

  Changed 5 months ago by cboos

Sorry, read #3911 in the above list of related tickets.

Add/Change #3251 (A documentation about components should be added)

Author



Change Properties
<Author field>
Action
as reopened
as The resolution will be set. Next status will be 'closed'
to The owner will change from jonas. Next status will be 'new'
 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.