Edgewall Software

Changes between Version 19 and Version 20 of TracProject/UiGuidelines


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 11, 2023, 7:26:03 PM (15 months ago)
Author:
figaro
Comment:

Removal of implemented feature

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • TracProject/UiGuidelines

    v19 v20  
    99=== Current Situation
    1010
    11 While the navigation interface provided by Trac 0.10 is in general clean and minimalistic, some problems of redundancy and inconsistency can be identified. The goal of this proposal is to clean-up and unify the navigation interface, and ultimately to establish guidelines for how Trac modules should hook into the navigation, so that they integrate nicely with the rest of the system.
     11While the navigation interface provided by Trac is in general clean and minimalistic, some problems of redundancy and inconsistency can be identified. The goal of this proposal is to clean-up and unify the navigation interface, and ultimately to establish guidelines for how Trac modules should hook into the navigation, so that they integrate nicely with the rest of the system.
    1212
    1313Trac currently provides the following navigational elements:
    … …  
    7575
    7676----
    77 ===== '' '' ===== #wiki-page-title
    78 The thoughts on navigation are well received, but I have one other gripe: the wiki pages don't have their title within the body of the page! Yes the title is in the title bar of the browser, but this isn't a place most people look. Having used several other wikis, I had grown used to seeing the CamelCase page titlein large type at top of the page. Makes it easier when communicating with others (over the phone for instance) - "I'm on page ''CoolFeatures'', what page are you lookin' at?"[[BR]]
    79 (See #1784)
    80 
    81 ----
    8277
    8378In addition to your nice and clear analysis of the trac navigation system, I'd like to raise an issue that I do not think you address, concerning what you call "Module" and "Local" navigation. When using trac, I feel there is a lot of inconsistency here and lots of room for improvement. It seems to me that these links/actions should be further broken down into 3 categories as opposed to the 2 that you propose: