Edgewall Software

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #9239, comment 13


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 23, 2010, 11:26:02 AM (14 years ago)
Author:
Mikael Relbe

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #9239, comment 13

    initial v1  
    33Thank you :D
    44
    5 Without knowing the details of the implementation (I've just scanned the code very roughly) I think it would be hard to obey `split_page_names` if the label is treated in an implicit manner. The example `[wiki:./ChildPage ./ChildPage]` from comment:7 would not be possible to render as "./ChildPage", which I would expect, unless treated explicitly as stated in comment:12 (at least I'm guessing that).
     5Without knowing the details of the implementation (I've just scanned the code very roughly) I think it would be hard to obey `split_page_names` if the label is treated in an implicit manner. The example `[wiki:./ChildPage ./ChildPage]` from comment:7 would perhaps not easily be rendered as "./!ChildPage", and not "Child Page", when `split_page_names = True`, which I would expect, unless treated explicitly as stated in comment:12 (at least I'm guessing that).
    66
    77Please note that 3. in comment:12 also doesn't respect `split_page_names`.