Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #11976, comment 1
- Timestamp:
- Mar 9, 2015, 7:36:31 AM (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #11976, comment 1
v1 v2 19 19 The `set_owner` and `permissions` attributes have significantly different functions. `reassign.set_owner = TICKET_APPEND` populates the //assign to// list with users having the `TICKET_APPEND` permission. `reassign.permissions = TICKET_APPEND` restricts the //reassign// action to users having the `TICKET_APPEND` permission. 20 20 21 The `set_owner` attribute is not new, however it's functionality has been expanded. The attribute is documented in [wiki:1.1/TracWorkflow#BasicTicketWorkflowCustomization]. In #11856 I proposed renaming the attribute to `owners`.21 The `set_owner` attribute is not new, however it's functionality has been expanded. The attribute is documented in [wiki:1.1/TracWorkflow#BasicTicketWorkflowCustomization]. In #11856 I have proposed renaming the attribute to `owners`. 22 22 23 23 > (in that some environments may have very large user groups and would prefer the group/permission restrictions without the visible list) and could be done with no compatibility issues for 1.2.x. 24 24 25 I've considered adding `restrict_owner` to the `[ticket-workflow]` section, making it an action attribute that takes precedence over the `[ticket] restrict_owner` setting. We could then restrict the allowed users using the `set_owner` / `owners` field without having a drop-down list. We could leave th eticket open for handling that feature request.25 I've considered adding `restrict_owner` to the `[ticket-workflow]` section, making it an action attribute that takes precedence over the `[ticket] restrict_owner` setting. We could then restrict the allowed users using the `set_owner` / `owners` field without having a drop-down list. We could leave this ticket open for handling that feature request.