Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #11741, comment 8
- Timestamp:
- Jan 28, 2015, 6:37:41 PM (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #11741, comment 8
v1 v2 1 1 Maybe it is an issue with Subversion client then, or the way in which the merge was done. Based on previous cases I've seen, it seems like merging [13611] would "carry-over" the record-only of [13610]. Here are some examples: [13155], [13127], [13121], [13091] ([search:?q=record-only+merge+1.0.&noquickjump=1&changeset=on more]). 2 2 3 I'm not sure what is different in this case, compared to [13090] :3 I'm not sure what is different in this case, compared to [13090]/[13091]: 4 4 5 5 {{{#!sh
