#9869 closed enhancement (fixed)
When seeing a branch in browse/log the name of the branch isn't shown (Mercurial)
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Remy Blank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.0 |
| Component: | version control/log view | Version: | |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Branch: | ||
| Release Notes: |
In TracRevisionLog and TracBrowser, show the name of the current branch |
||
| API Changes: | |||
| Internal Changes: | |||
Description
When using mercurial in branched development, in operation with branches never appear the related branch.
Attachments (1)
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
| Component: | plugin/mercurial → version control/log view |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | → 0.13 |
| Owner: | set to |
by , 15 years ago
| Attachment: | 9869-show-branches-tags-r10426.patch added |
|---|
Show branches and tags in source browser and change log.
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
9869-show-branches-tags-r10426.patch adds branch and tag labels in the source browser (below the path) and in the change log (after the summary). The styles are the same as in the timeline. The colors stick out a bit, but are not too bad.
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Whoa, you're fast :) See also the top-left of demo-0.13/browser/trac.hg.
Ok, I'm going to apply the patch shortly.
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
I just happen to be around … working on a fix similar to r10431 ;-) (I've updated to that version now).
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 15 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Patch applied in [10433].
(Mmh… That revision didn't sync…)
comment:7 by , 15 years ago
(Mmh… That revision didn't sync…)
See #9978. I called the hook manually once again.
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 15 years ago
btw, why are you excluding master and default branches in [10433], and on the other hand, trunk is not excluded…?
comment:9 by , 15 years ago
Replying to hvr@…:
btw, why are you excluding
masteranddefaultbranches in [10433]
I used the same exclusion as we have on the timeline, so I didn't give that any thought. Christian?
and on the other hand,
trunkis not excluded…?
Trunk is mostly a Subversion term, which doesn't have the concepts of branch and tag (no, copies don't cut it). We don't show the branches or tags with Subversion (at least up to now), so trunk is never shown anyway.
comment:10 by , 15 years ago
See #9607. My first approach was to allow each backend to contribute to branch/tag ignore lists, but then that proved too complicated for what it was worth (basically adding only 'master' for Git, and 'default' for Mercurial). 'trunk' is not excluded as if it is present in either Mercurial or Git, then it's worth mentioning it, as it's not the default for that kind of repository. I admit that by the same reasoning, a branch named 'master' for a Mercurial repository and a branch named 'default' for a Git repository should be shown as such. So this is indeed perfectible.
comment:11 by , 13 years ago
| Release Notes: | modified (diff) |
|---|
The branch name should definitely be shown at least in the revision log. I'm not sure about the browser, though.