Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#13287 new defect
MS Outlook improvements for 1.4.1 shows only empty fields
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.6.1 |
Component: | general | Version: | 1.4.1 |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Branch: | ||
Release Notes: | |||
API Changes: | |||
Internal Changes: |
Description (last modified by )
Dear Ryan,
I updated the e-mail template by replacing the ${ticket_props}
as suggested here in TracNotification#CustomizingContent, with CookBook/Notification/Templates.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- # set sel = ('Reporter', 'Owner', 'Type', 'Status', 'Priority', 'Milestone', 'Component', 'Severity', 'Resolution', 'Keywords') # for a in ticket_props.replace('|', '\n').splitlines()[1:-1]|map('trim'): # set a = a.split(':', 1)|map('trim')|list # if len(a) > 1 and a[0] in sel: ${'%-*s %s'|format(12, a[0] + ':', a[1])} # endif # endfor --------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, notification works - no error, but I have only empty fields in the e-mail as it is shown here below:
#1703: NEST for coping with bunching of regulated traffic -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: Owner: Type: Status: Priority: Milestone: Component: Severity: Resolution: Keywords: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment (by Laszlo Elbert): testx -- Ticket URL: <https://nest-tool.eurocontrol.int/trac/nest/ticket/1703#comment:32> NEST <https://www.eurocontrol.int/nest> NEST project
Thanks for the advise in advance Laszlo
Attachments (0)
Change History (22)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → worksforme |
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Dear Ryan, I copied 1 by 1 your text, still my tickets are empty, restarted apache2, etc. Nothing in the log. Just it seems to me that values are not filled. Any idea how can I arrive to get it work? Thanks Laszlo
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Any possibility you have another copy of that the ticket_notify_email.txt
template somewhere on Trac's template search path?
I'd revert and redo each step to confirm, restarting the web server and verifying functionality at each step:
- Remove
ticket_notify_email.txt
- Add standard
ticket_notify_email.txt
from TracNotification#CustomizingContent to$env/templates
- Replace
$env/templates/ticket_notify_email.txt
with comment:2 template contents
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 5 years ago
Dear Ryan,
If I use the standard ticket_notify_email.txt, I get the email filled from ${ticket_props} values, but if I replace with comment2 I get empty fields. I have several instances, and the problem is the same, fields are empty, maybe that guy does not get the value a[1]
:
#1703: NEST for coping with bunching of regulated traffic -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: Laszlo Elbert | (none) Type: | Status: defect | closed Priority: | Milestone: medium | 1.7.1 Component: | Version: Software | 1.7.0 Severity: | Resolution: major | duplicate Keywords: | Estimatedhours: 0 Quick (<4 hours) to do: | Automatic testing required: 0 0 | Missing in NEST compared to SAAM: | Possible impact on DDR2: 0 0 | Private: | To revalidate on Merge Network: 0 0 | Fixing revision: | Trunk report revision: Validation notes: | -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
comment:8 by , 5 years ago
Thanks for the reply. This gives the following below
#1703: NEST for coping with bunching of regulated traffic -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [u'Reporter', u''] [u'Owner', u''] [u'Type', u''] [u'Status', u''] [u'Priority', u''] [u'Milestone', u''] [u'Component', u''] [u'Severity', u''] [u'Resolution', u''] [u'Keywords', u''] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment (by Laszlo Elbert):
comment:9 by , 5 years ago
Next try:
# for a in ticket_props.replace('|', '\n').splitlines()[1:-1]|map('trim'): # set a = a.split(':', 1)|map('trim')|list # if len(a) > 1 and a[0] in sel: ${'%-*s %s'|format(12, a[0] + ':', a[1])} # endif # endfor
→
# for a in ticket_props.replace('|', '\n').splitlines()[1:-1]|map('trim'): # ${a} # endfor
comment:10 by , 5 years ago
We are getting there, there is a shift by one line as I'm the reporter.
#1703: NEST for coping with bunching of regulated traffic -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: Owner: Laszlo Elbert (none) Type: Status: defect closed Priority: Milestone: medium 1.7.1 Component: Version: Software 1.7.0 Severity: Resolution: major duplicate Keywords: Estimatedhours: 0 Quick (<4 hours) to do: Automatic testing required: 0 0 Missing in NEST compared to SAAM: Possible impact on DDR2: 0 0 Private: To revalidate on Merge Network: 0 0 Fixing revision: Trunk report revision: Validation notes: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Opportunity(justification): Traceability comments (doc, test): -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment (by Laszlo Elbert): sdsadasd
comment:11 by , 5 years ago
I think the issue is that your custom field labels are very long. Can you shorten this one to be something like: Missing in NEST compared to SAAM:
→ Missing in NEST vs SAAM:
?
comment:12 by , 5 years ago
Congratulations and thanks, the problem is somewhere there.
#1703: NEST for coping with bunching of regulated traffic -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: Laszlo Owner: (none) Elbert Type: defect Status: closed Priority: medium Milestone: 1.7.1 Component: Software Version: 1.7.0 Severity: major Resolution: duplicate Keywords: Estimatedhours: 0 Quick (<4 hours) to do: 0 Automatic testing req'd: 0 Missing in NEST vs SAAM: 0 Possible impact on DDR2: 0 Private: 0 Revalidate on MergeNetwork: 0 Fixing revision: Trunk report revision: Validation notes:
comment:13 by , 5 years ago
This should work, without worry for the ticket custom field length:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- # set fields = ('Reporter', 'Owner', 'Type', 'Status', 'Priority', 'Milestone', 'Component', 'Severity', 'Resolution', 'Keywords') # for f in fields: ${'%-*s %s'|format(12, f + ':', ticket[f.lower()])} # endfor --------------------------------------------------------------------------
follow-up: 15 comment:14 by , 5 years ago
Thank you very much for your help. The only minor aesthetics is that the name of reporter is chopped off, but is already perfectly usable.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: Laszlo Owner: (none) Type: defect Status: closed Priority: medium Milestone: 1.7.1 Component: Software Severity: major Resolution: Keywords: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment (by Laszlo Elbert): And now
comment:15 by , 5 years ago
Replying to laszlo.elbert@…:
The only minor aesthetics is that the name of reporter is chopped off, but is already perfectly usable.
The issue there is that the userid is being used rather than the User Name that is saved in preferences.
comment:16 by , 5 years ago
Milestone: | → next-stable-1.4.x |
---|
We might want to pass more ticket data to the template rendering so that we provide more control in implementing a custom notification template. An example would be a dictionary with the ticket field names, original values and formatted values (e.g. real name from author name).
comment:17 by , 5 years ago
Status: | reopened → new |
---|
comment:18 by , 4 years ago
Milestone: | next-stable-1.4.x → 1.4.3 |
---|
It's really unfortunate that we pass the "ticket_values" dict as the "ticket" variable. Ideally we would pass ticket_values
as ticket_values
and the ticket
object as ticket
.
I propose that we populate ticket
with the same formatted values that are contained in ticket_props
, so that we can use the comment:13 patch and not parse ticket_props
as is done in CookBook/Notification/Templates#jinja2, which is problematic due to wrapping (comment:11).
We could also pass the ticket
object as ticket.ticket
.
That change would be backward-incompatible, but shouldn't affect too many, if any, users. Maybe it should be deferred to 1.5.x?
Thoughts?
comment:19 by , 4 years ago
Summary: | MS Outlook improvements for 1.4.1 does shows only empty fields → MS Outlook improvements for 1.4.1 shows only empty fields |
---|
comment:20 by , 4 years ago
Milestone: | 1.4.3 → 1.5.3 |
---|
comment:21 by , 4 years ago
Milestone: | 1.5.3 → 1.5.4 |
---|
comment:22 by , 3 years ago
Milestone: | 1.5.4 → 1.6.1 |
---|
I'm not sure, it works fine for me:
Please use MailingList in the future for support inquiries, but we can take this one to completion here.