Edgewall Software
Modify

Ticket #8441 (closed enhancement: duplicate)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

Component Structure

Reported by: coreycothrum@… Owned by:
Priority: low Milestone:
Component: ticket system Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:
Release Notes:
API Changes:

Description

This ticket suggest a method of improved organization when sorting tickets by component.

The current way the component system is set up, it only lends itself to broad categories. I'd like to see more structure, allowing components to become 'subcomponents'.

An example would be something like:
web
web.internal
web.external
web.external.ftp
web.external.http
... ect ...

Having fine grained components could lead to better ticket organization. A more concrete example can be seen in this trac environment... both admin/console and admin/web are listed as components.

Now, I realize that there is nothing stopping someone from adding these names to the list. The real problem lies in the way we can query them.

With the custom query menu, you can only select "is" and "is not" for the component filter. I'd like to add a "begins with" to this. This would allow me to select the "web" component, but still see all it's children components. If I'd like to see something more specific, I could select "web.external".

thanks,
Corey

Attachments

Change History

comment:1 follow-up: Changed 3 years ago by ebray

This is mostly a duplicate of #548, though it does raise the point that startswith/endswith filters for enum fields could be added to the custom query page. This could be a reasonable use case for not just limiting them to "is"/"is not".

comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 3 years ago by rblank

  • Resolution set to duplicate
  • Status changed from new to closed

Replying to ebray:

... though it does raise the point that startswith/endswith filters for enum fields could be added to the custom query page. This could be a reasonable use case for not just limiting them to "is"/"is not".

And this in turn has been requested several times for other purposes, e.g. #5979, #5526. So yes, definitely a duplicate.

comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by anonymous

Sorry for the dup guys, I didn't see those previous tickets. I'm happy with the implementation in #5979 .

View

Add a comment

Modify Ticket

Change Properties
<Author field>
Action
as closed
The resolution will be deleted. Next status will be 'reopened'
to The owner will be changed from (none). Next status will be 'closed'
Author


E-mail address and user name can be saved in the Preferences.

 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.