Translation of Trac to Italian/Italiano [it_IT]

[asmodai@…]

This ticket should be used to coordinate the translation to Italian. See also TracTermsIt.

[lallo@…]

first cut italian translation

[lallo@…]

I translated also a subset of standard wiki pages, should I attach those as well?

[jruigrok]

I have committed it with one minor change in the headers.

The wiki pages are interesting yes, but please wait with attaching, I need to double check something first since they're outside the scope of babel as they are too big to stuff in a messages.po file.

Can you provide more details or a patch yourself so I can list you in the THANKS file?

[Lele Gaifax]

Update of Italian catalog, diff against current trunk

[Lele Gaifax]

Update of Italian catalog, diff against r7028

[jruigrok]

Committed in r7029.

Mille grazie!

[Lele Gaifax]

Update of Italian catalog, diff against r7722

[jruigrok]

Committed in r7738. Grazie!

[cboos]

it_IT renamed to it in r9143.

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

I revamped the italian catalog, in particular choosing different words for the "Timeline" (rendered with "Cronologia") and for the "Roadmap" (used "Obbiettivi" instead of "Tappe").

There are still 11 untranslated entries, mostly related to "low-level" errors and subversion specific terms which I never saw (like "eligible"...). All fuzzy entries are fixed.

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

The complete catalog

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

Diff against r9348 of the italian catalog

[cboos]

Thanks, committed in [9350].

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

New diff against r9351, up-to-date with r9367

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

I get three errors when validating the catalog:

msgfmt --statistics -c -v -o /dev/null trac/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po
trac/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po:2190: a format specification for argument 'unit', as in 'msgstr[0]', doesn't exist in 'msgid'
trac/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po:2197: a format specification for argument 'unit', as in 'msgstr[0]', doesn't exist in 'msgid'
trac/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po:2204: a format specification for argument 'unit', as in 'msgstr[0]', doesn't exist in 'msgid'
msgfmt: found 3 fatal errors
1033 translated messages, 8 untranslated messages.

but I can't spot the problem:

#: trac/templates/progress_bar.html:24
#, python-format
msgid "%(num)s of %(total)s %(unit)s %(title)s"
msgid_plural "%(num)s of %(total)s %(units)s %(title)s"
msgstr[0] "%(num)s di %(total)s %(unit)s %(title)s"
msgstr[1] "%(num)s di %(total)s %(units)s %(title)s"

(the other two are very similar, all involving a singular/plural message)

It seems a spurious report, isn't it?

[cboos]

Well, it's apparently a real error for msgfmt tools and fine for the python Babel toolchain. This is a known issue and the reason why I reopened #8588, as I'd like to find a way to handle this without msgfmt complaining.

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

New diff against r9351, up-to-date with r9375

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

New diff against r9351, up-to-date with r9376

[cboos]

Thanks, trac-it-vs-r9351_r9376.diff​ applied in r9385.

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

New diff against r9385, up-to-date with r9378

[cboos]

Last patch trac-it-vs-r9385_r9378.diff​ applied in r9389.

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

Patch to fix #9171

[cboos]

(last patch was applied in r9404)

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

Approaching 100%

[cboos]

Committed as [9445]. Btw, would you prefer to commit the changes yourself?

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

Update italian catalog to r9469

[Lele Gaifax <lele@…>]

Replying to cboos:

Committed as [9445]. Btw, would you prefer to commit the changes yourself?

I'd have no problem with that, I imagine it would take away some bore from you :)

[lgaifax]

r9483 supercedes latest attachment. From now on I'll commit directly to the svn repo, thank you.

[cboos]

Great! I'm happy we can do it this way.

For other Italian contributors, please continue to use this ticket for contributing feedback and suggestions to Lele. You can also directly subscribe to the RSS feed you'll find on log:trunk/trac/locale/it to be notified from his updates.

[fero@…]

Replying to Lele Gaifax <lele@…>:

I revamped the italian catalog, in particular choosing different words for the "Timeline" (rendered with "Cronologia") and for the "Roadmap" (used "Obbiettivi" instead of "Tappe").

I think that "Obiettivi" and "Obiettivo" are better than "Obbiettivi" and "Obbiettivo".

It seems that is also the "Accademia della crusca" opinion.
Take a look at:

​http://forum.accademiadellacrusca.it/forum_5/interventi/910.shtml

and to this enjoyful, and "more official" explanation (than a forum post)

​http://www.accademiadellacrusca.it/faq/faq_risp.php?id=4027&ctg_id=44

[anonymous]

Replying to fero@…:

I think that "Obiettivi" and "Obiettivo" are better than "Obbiettivi" and "Obbiettivo".

See also #9299. It's a bikeshedding issue, but of course I'll replace the term if enough people complain :-)

[CP]

Yes. As an Italian, I do prefer oBiettivo, with one B. The BB version sounds like a dialect variant nowadays, although it can be found in dated Italian literature. CP

[Lele Gaifax]

Ok, even if I disagree, I'll do that sooner or later given that at least three people asked. Of course a patch for that would be welcome (better attached to #9299 at this point).

[anonymous]

come posso cambiare la lingua utilizzando questi file???